Gestalt Theory

ge·stalt (noun)

/ɡəˈSHtält/

An organized whole that is perceived as more than the sum of its parts

— Oxford Languages

For some of you, the concepts may be a review from Digital 2D Design, but they are important when we talk about UI design; these are the principles that make a design work. Gestalt theory is why we can navigate interfaces with multiple levels of content without becoming completely overwhelmed.

Key Principles

There are 4 key properties with gestalt systems: emergence, reification, multistability, and invariance. These properties cover our general perception and the "big ideas" of gestalt. They're supported by other gestalt laws and concepts, so don't worry if your understanding of something feels like it is a match for one of these principles and another concept too.

Emergence

With emergence, we simplify elements to their general forms. Detailed objects can be slower and more difficult to understand, so our minds focus on the simpler options: the overall outline of a form.

Even without a border, we simplify the group of many small dots into one heart shape.

Other principles and concepts discuss our ways of grouping elements, but emergence is specifically looking at that "bigger picture" and eschewing too much detail for the simpler explanation.

Heart illustration by Stephy Miehle on behalf of McHenry County College licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

When we see an image, we first attempt to identify it by its outline or general shape. We then compare that to the objects in our mental inventory. This is why our brains recognize simple, well-defined objects more quickly than complex ones.

From an evolutionary perspective, this makes a lot of sense. If you’re out wandering in a jungle, it’s in your best interest to be able to quickly identify a leopard so you don’t get attacked. It would be much less useful for you to first identify the individual shapes of its spots.

— Sara Dholakia, "The Intersection of Psychology & Design"

Reification

With reification, we recognize and deduce more information that what is present; our brains fill in the gaps. Along with closure, this can come in handy for logos, icons, or illustrations.

There is no triangle overlapping the circles
2 apostrophe-like shapes, not 1 split squiggle
A group of flat objects, not a 3D spiked sphere
Illustrations by Mrmw via Wikipedia licensed under CC0 1.0

Multistability

We are able to alternate between multiple ambiguous interpretations; neither one is "right". This concept is common in optical illusions – and sometimes clever logos.

Optical illusion depicting either a vase or pair of faces
Rubin's Vase is a popular example that can be interpreted as either a vase or pair of faces. Some more elaborate structures can even appear to show people standing and facing each other.
"Rubin vase depiction" by John smithson 2007; public domain
The Necker Cube is a basic wireframe cube. With no context provided for its orientation; the lower-left or upper-right squares can both be interpreted as the 'front' side.

Invariance

We can recognize objects even when they are rotated, scaled, stretched, lightly distorted, or shown in different lighting.

The 2 of clubs is warped, rotated in 3D, and skewed diagonally, but our minds interpret all of these cards to be versions of the top-left playing card.
Card illustration by Stephy Miehle on behalf of McHenry County College licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Imagine if you could only recognize someone you knew if they stood directly in front of you and faced you, but you couldn’t recognize them once they turned in profile. Despite the different visual perspective we can still recognize people.

— Steven Bradley, "Design Principles: Visual Perception And The Principles Of Gestalt"

Principles & Laws of Gestalt

This list is non-exhaustive; over time, some new principles have been identified. For a look at some of the other principles, read "Design Principles: Visual Perception And The Principles Of Gestalt" on Smashing Magazine.

Proximity

Nearby objects are perceptually grouped together. Space between objects (and groups of objects) can be used to show that their content does not belong together.

We can perceive groups within groups. On the left is a group with 3 columns. On the right, a group with 3 columns of 2-column dots.
Dot illustration by Stephy Miehle on behalf of McHenry County College licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Screenshot of Spotify's playlist cards

The Spotify "Made for You" category has many playlist cards with short descriptions. We are able to group the description to the correct card due to their close proximity, and there is enough of a gap between the images that we recognize them as separate elements.

The horizontal gap between images is greater than the vertical gap between the images and their descriptions, so we do not interpret this as a "row of images" and a "row of text" underneath.

Common Region

Some old-school interpretations place this within the realm of Proximity – newer laws, including this one, were added to gestalt theory later on. Common Region uses boundaries such as background colors or borders to help separate and group content. These boundaries create "containers" or "blocks" for your content and are heavily used in interface design.

Screenshot of Serious Eats homepage showing articles grouped in cards
The Serious Eats site has many articles and recipes laid out in content cards. These are one of the easiest ways to create a relationship between an image and text as well as separate individual articles from each other. This is slightly different from the Spotify proximity example, as the descriptions here are contained within blocks that have a background color separating them from the page.
Website © Serious Eats

Common Region is helpful when white space alone isn't enough to keep content separated, but too many harsh boundaries can make a design look cluttered. Worse, users might reach the end of a region and think that they've reached the end of the page or screen. Design elements can inform the user that there is still content to discover.

Screenshot of Stripe's website showing diagonal sections
The Stripe website has occasional diagonal edges on its common regions. When you scroll down the page and think you may have reached the bottom, seeing one of the diagonal corners peeking out of the screen signals that you should keep scrolling.
Website © Stripe

Read more: Nielsen Norman Group, "The Principle of Common Region: Containers Create Groupings"

Similarity

Elements that are similar are grouped together. You can build similiarity with size, color, shape, and more.

We easily separate the squares from the circles. Next, we form secondary color-based groups within the set of circles.
Screenshot of Serious Eats homepage showing articles grouped in cards
The GrubHub sign-in page has options to sign in with an account on their site (username/password) or through separate apps (Google, Facebook). All of these are presented as similar wide, colorful buttons with centered text and small icons along the left side. The change in color helps to identify each app and show that while they're related options, they are not the same options.
Website © GrubHub

Closure

Closure is a popular choice for design elements, especially logos and illustrations. We "fill in the blanks" to create a whole element. Effective use of closure gives us just enough information to see the intended design; without enough details, closure could be interpreted in too many ways.

With enough information, we understand that the dashed lines create a circle. When too many are removed, the shape is ambiguous: is it a square? A circle? Something else entirely? We need to leave enough clues for our minds to come to the right conclusion.
Illustration by Stephy Miehle on behalf of McHenry County College licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

The original NBC peacock logo was much busier than its current design. The peacock was outlined in front of its rainbow feathers. In 1986, the outline was removed and the peacock's body was implied through clever use of a triangle of negative space and the small beak overlapping the purple shape.

Original 1956 logo
1986 redesign showing closure
Original 1956 Peacock Logo © NBC1986 NBC Peacock Logo © NBC

Continuation

When we see elements forming a path, we treat those elements as a related set. We can also continue to navigate that path.

This one is huge on mobile! We can take advantage of horizontal scrolling to show additional content without taking up as much vertical room. Once we see enough elements creating a horizontal path, we understand that we can scroll to see more, especially if we see the last one partially cut-off.

Avatar selection on Netflix

Avatar selection on Netflix uses horizontal and vertical continuity, as there are many more rows to choose from

Interface © Netflix

Google Play Games

Google Play Games has horizontal and vertical continuity

Interface © Google Play

Google Play Games

Google Play Games features many rows of content cut off horizontally

Interface © Google Play

Common Fate

When elements are moving towards the same direction, we perceive them to be related. Another very similar related principle is Parallelism, when elements are not only moving together but are parallel as well.

Trend charts showing pho and ramen searches increasing, while soba searches stay relatively steady
On Google Trends, searches from 2004-present have steadily increased for "pho" and "ramen" but stayed relatively stable for the "soba" search term. Though all chart lines are moving horizontally and share a common fate, we might also consider "pho" and "ramen" to be more related to each other than to "soba" because their chart lines look more similar (and they both became much trendier).
Website © Google Trends

Prägnanz (Good Form)

Our brains like simplicity. We can see ambiguous or complex designs and interpret them as simpler pieces or a simpler whole.

For instance, consider the Olympic Rings, which also display good similarity and closure. Instead of seeing their complex shapes with cut-out gaps, we like the easier answer: intertwined, overlapping circles. Though there are 3 unique shapes among the 5 rings (i.e. they are not identical copies), we understand them to be individual, similar components of one group together.

"Olympic Rings" by Baron Pierre de Coubertin; public domain

We can feed this need for simplicity with our design choices, too. These charts display the same information, but it is faster for us to process information from the organized, sorted chart than the more dynamic-looking one.

Dynamic chart
Sorted chart
Chart illustrations by Stephy Miehle on behalf of McHenry County College licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Figure-Ground Relationship

This is the relationship between a form/figure and its background, or the interaction of positive and negative space.

A reversible or ambiguous figure-ground relationship can display multistability and alternate between multiple interpretations.

Stable
Reversible
Ambiguous
Illustrations by Stephy Miehle on behalf of McHenry County College licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Figure-ground can move beyond illustrations. Below, website elements are layered to focus attention. We know which elements are on top because of the partially-transparent shadow (often called a "curtain" in this treatment) covering up the rest of the page, or the ground. Since the pop-up window is not covered by this curtain, it must be stacked on top of it. This effectively designates the pop-up window as a stable figure on top of the rest of the page.

Screenshot of a modal on the Gap website
A modal window on GAP uses a partially-transparent "curtain" to create contrast between the modal pop-up window and the rest of the page.
Website © GAP

Sample Interface: LOCUS

balazs ketyi 6ba vdgx go unsplash
LOCUS is a smart city and IOT mobile application. The application provides a direct connection between the citizens and the information system of the city in a visualized form.
Photo by Balázs Kétyi on Unsplash

Let's talk about this design. There's a lot of information going on in this app screenshot, but already, our minds are breaking up the interface into smaller sections:

  • Navigation bar

  • Title

  • Chart

  • "You might feel..." panel

  • Call-to-action button

  • Forecast panel

...and those sections can even be broken down into smaller pieces. This screen could appear to be very busy with different formatting, but Gestalt principles make it less overwhelming.

We mostly separate those groupings by common region. The navigational bar is one wide row, followed by the title and chart section, and then individual panels and buttons grouped together with slightly different background colors.

The chart could just be a random group of lines, but because they share a common fate, they are perceived as related. Within the chart, the bars use similarity with their colors to show which sets are grouped together.

Within the Forecast panel, we see 3 distinct informational sections that are grouped by their similarity. Each section shows good continuation to guide us from left to right. We can enforce that continuity by centering or aligning items vertically. Here, the "Local Point" text aligns to the top of "14km" and "51 km from your location" aligns to the bottom, creating a tidy appearance and an implied horizontal line across the screen.

The whole design uses a greyish-blue except for the "warning" bars and "I've felt it" button, which both use the contrast of red to create a focal point that urges the viewer to use caution (top bars) or take action (by tapping the button).